Araştırma Makalesi

Being zoē: theorizing childhood through world cinema

Sayı: 15 23 Şubat 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Being zoē: theorizing childhood through world cinema

Abstract

This article examines the cinematic gaze on childhood in world cinema from a sociological perspective by bringing the being / becoming framework of the new sociology of childhood—developed primarily within the British sociology of childhood tradition—into dialogue with Agamben’s distinction between zoē (nature) and bios (discourse). While childhood in cinema is often positioned within developmental or nostalgic narratives, this article argues that certain films render childhood visible as a domain of experience that resists adult expectations and institutional arrangements. Drawing on examples from world cinema across diverse cultural and national contexts, childhood is conceptualized not as a culturally bounded figure but as a transnational cinematic form through which modern social orders are negotiated. To this end, the article employs the analytic pair being zoē and becoming bios in parallel, demonstrating how the cinematic child is situated both within and beyond prevailing social regulations. The child on screen is approached as a threshold figure whose openness, uncanniness, excess, and indeterminacy bring into view the points of tension within modern social orders. In doing so, the article proposes an original sociological theoretical framework for understanding representations of childhood in world cinema.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Abel, R. (1998). The cine goes town: French cinema (1896–1914). University of California.
  2. Agamben, G. (1993). Infancy and history: The destruction of experience (Trans. L. Heron). Verso.
  3. Agamben, G. (1995). Idea of prose (Trans. M. Sullivan & S. Whitsitt). SUNY.
  4. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (Trans. D. Heller-Roazen). Stanford University.
  5. Alanen, L. (1988). Rethinking childhood. Acta sciologica, 31(1), 53-67.
  6. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life (Trans. R. Baldick). Vintage Books.
  7. Arpacı, M. (2024). Building pious generations in Turkey: The Islamization of childhood in the children’s magazine of the Directorate of Religious Affairs. Sociology lens, 37(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12449
  8. Atalay, G. E., & Muratoğlu Pehlivan, B. (2024). Aestheticizing the pain: A critical analysis of media representation of earthquake victim children in Turkey. Sociology lens, 37(1), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12437

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sanat Sosyolojisi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

23 Şubat 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Ocak 2026

Kabul Tarihi

18 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Sayı: 15

Kaynak Göster

APA
Düzcan, E. (2026). Being zoē: theorizing childhood through world cinema. ARTS: Artuklu Sanat ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 15, 131-150. https://doi.org/10.46372/arts.1856750