From scriptor to promptor: An evaluation of the status of authorship, authenticity, and creativity in light of the use of artificial intelligence in screenwriting

Ali Özgür Gürsoy; Serkan Şavk

doi:10.46372/arts.1482636

TR EN

Kâtip yazardan komut veren yazara: Senaryo yazımında yapay zekâ kullanımı ışığında yazarlık, otantiklik ve yaratıcılığın durum değerlendirmesi

Öz

Üretken yapay zekânın yaratıcı alanlara girişinin yol açacağı potansiyel zorluklar açık olsa da bunların kesin olarak nasıl ve hangi şekillerde vücut bulacağı henüz net değildir. Bu hususta önemli bir endişe, orijinal ve sahte arasındaki çizginin daha belirsiz hale geleceğidir. Bu çalışmada, dilin doğasına ilişkin bir dizi felsefi kuramdan yararlanarak, üretici yapay zekâ söz konusu olduğunda yazarlık ve özgünlük durumunun analiz edilebileceği kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturuyoruz. İki kavramsal yönelimin, yani yapısöküm ve kökbilimin, yazarlığın her zaman bir ortak yazarlık olarak görülmesi gerektiği iddiasında birleştiğini savunuyoruz. Daha sonra bu kavramsal çerçeveye, senaryo çekici (logline) ve sinopsislerinin yapay zekâ desteğiyle üretildiği bir sınıf deneyinin sonuçlarını yorumlamak için başvuruyoruz. Araştırmamızın bulguları, yaratıcı üretimde kendilerini sorumlu biçimde ifade etmeleri için öğrencilerin eleştirel becerilerini geliştirmemiz gerektiğini göstermektedir. İnsan – yapay zekâ etkileşiminin potansiyelini ancak bu şekilde ortaya çıkarabiliriz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

From scriptor to promptor: An evaluation of the status of authorship, authenticity, and creativity in light of the use of artificial intelligence in screenwriting

Abstract

The disruptive potential of generative artificial intelligence in creative fields is clear, but how this will unfold remains uncertain. A key concern is that the problematic distinction between the original and the fake is going to become further blurred. In this study, we draw on a number of philosophical theories on the nature of language to set up a conceptual framework within which one can analyze the status of authorship and originality in the operation of generative AI. We argue that two conceptual orientations, namely deconstruction and genealogy, converge on the claim that authorship should be seen as always already a co-authorship. We use this conceptual framework to interpret the results of a classroom experiment with generative AI in producing screenplay loglines and synopses. Our findings suggest that we must improve students' critical skills to foster responsible self-expression in creative production, thereby unlocking the potential of human – AI interaction.

Keywords

Kaynakça

Anguiano, D. (2023, 27th September). Hollywood writers agree to end five-month strike after new studio deal. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/26/hollywood-writers-strike-ends-studio-deal
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd edition). Harvard University.
Barthes, R. (1978). Image-music-text (1st edition) (Trans. S. Health). Hill & Wang.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (1st edition) (p. 610-623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Crichton, M. (Director). (1973). Westworld [Movie]. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
Chow, P.-S. (2020). Ghost in the (Hollywood) machine: Emergent applications of artificial intelligence in the film industry. NECSUS, 9(1), 193-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14307
Cizek, K., Uricchio, W., Anderson, J., Agui Carter, M., Detroit Narrative Agency, Harris, T. A., Holmes, M. K., Lachman, R., Massiah, L., Mertes, C., Rafsky, S., Stephenson, M., Winger-Bearskin, A. & Wolozin, S. (2022). Collective wisdom: Co-creating media for equity and justice (1st edition). MIT. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13394.001.0001
Çelik, K. (2024). AI vs. human in screenwriting: Is AI the future screenwriter?. Sakarya iletişim, 4(1), 1-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/silet/issue/85388/1483478

Deleuze, G. (1997). Cinema 2: The time-image (1st edition) (Trans. H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta). University of Minnesota.
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference (1st edition) (Trans. A. Bass). University Of Chicago.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc (1st edition) (Trans. S. Weber, J. Mehlman & A. Bass). Northwestern University.
Derrida, J. (1998). Of grammatology (Corrected edition) (Trans. G. C. Spivak). Johns Hopkins University.
Epstein, J. (2014). The Intelligence of a machine (1st edition) (Trans. C. Wall-Romana). Univocal.
Floridi, L. (2023). AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. Philosophy & technology, 36(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y
Foucault, M. (1980). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (2nd edition) (Trans. D. F. Bouchard & S. Simon). Cornell University.
Foucault, M. (1982). The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language (1st edition) (Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith). Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1998). Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (1st edition) (Trans. J. D. Faubion). New.
Glynn, P. (2023, 18th April). Sony World Photography Award 2023: Winner refuses award after revealing AI creation. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65296763
Gordijn, B. & Have, H. T. (2023). ChatGPT: Evolution or revolution?. Medicine, health care and philosophy, 26(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0
Ilıcak, N. G. & Çinko, K. (2021). Yapay zekânın yarattığı masal: Prenses ile tilki. TEKE, 10(2), 703-719. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/teke/issue/62851/953805
Kasirzadeh, A. & Gabriel, I. (2023). In conversation with artificial intelligence: Aligning language models with human values. Philosophy & technology, 36(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.00731
Landymore F. (2024, 19th January). Novelist wins award, then reveals she used ChatGPT. Futurism. https://futurism.com/the-byte/novelist-wins-award-then-reveals-she-used-chatgpt
Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Fedorenko, E. (2024). Dissociating language and thought in large language models. Trends in cognitive sciences, 28(6), 517-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.01.011
Milmo, D. (2024, 8th January). ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/08/ai-tools-chatgpt-copyrighted-material-openai
Nolan, C. (Director). (2014). Interstellar [Movie]. Paramount & Warner Bros.
openai.com. (2024, 13rd February). Memory and new controls for ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/memory-and-new-controls-for-chatgpt
Rehn, A. & de Cock, C. (2008). Deconstructing creativity. T. Rickards, M. A. Runco & S. Moger (Ed.), The Routledge companion to creativity (1st edition) (p. 222-231). Routledge.
Reeh-Peters, C. (2023). Film as artificial intelligence: Jean Epstein, film-thinking and the speculative-materialist turn in contemporary philosophy. Film-philosophy, 27(2), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2023.0224
Searle, J. R. (1970). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (1st edition). Cambridge University.
Scott, R. (Director). (1982). Blade Runner [Movie]. Warner Bros.
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1: The fault of epimetheus (1st edition) (Trans. G. Collins & R. Beardsworth). Stanford University.
Stokel-Walker, C. (2022, 9th December). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays—Should professors worry? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023, 18th January). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Terry, O. K. (2023, 12nd May). I’m a student. You have no idea how much We’re Using ChatGPT. The chronicle of higher education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/im-a-student-you-have-no-idea-how-much-were-using-chatgpt
Hadero, H. & Bauder, D. (2023, 27th December). The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/new-york-times-openailawsuit_n_658c76a2e4b03057f5cc417b?utm_source=pocket_saves
Wachowski, L. & L. Wachowski (Directors). (1999). The Matrix [Movie]. Warner Bros. & Village Roadshow.
Wei, J., Tay Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., Chi, E. H., Hashimoto, T., Vinyals, O., Liang, P., Dean, J. & Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. Transactions on machine learning research. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07682
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P. S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., Kenton, Z., Brown, S., Hawkins, W., Stepleton, T., Biles, C., Birhane, A., Haas, J., Rimell, L., Hendricks, L. A., Isaac, W., Legassick, S., Irving, G. & Gabriel, I. (2021). Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.04359
Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Rauh M., Griffin, C., Huang, P. S., Mellor, J. F. J., Glaese, A., Cheng, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., Biles, C., Brown, S., Kenton, Z., Hawkins, W., Stepleton, T., Birhane, A., Hendricks, L. A., Rimell, L., Isaac, W. S., Haas, J., Legassick, S., Irving, G. & Iason Gabriel, I. (2022). Taxonomy of risks posed by language models. FAccT ‘22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (1st edition) (p. 214-229). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533088
wgacontract2023.org. (____a). WGA negotiations-status as of May 1, 2023. https://www.wgacontract2023.org/uploadedfiles/members/member_info/contract-2023/wga_proposals.pdf
wgacontract2023.org. (____b). Summary of the 2023 WGA MBA. https://www.wgacontract2023.org/the-campaign/summary-of-the-2023-wga-mba
Wikipedia. (____). 2023 Writers Guild of America strike. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Writers_Guild_of_America_strike

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sanat Tarihi, Teori ve Eleştiri (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ali Özgür Gürsoy
0000-0003-3332-9921
Türkiye

Serkan Şavk ^*
0000-0002-3926-8384
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

2 Eylül 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Eylül 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Mayıs 2024

Kabul Tarihi

2 Ağustos 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Sayı: 12

DOI

https://doi.org/10.46372/arts.1482636

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA75MG96WY

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gürsoy, A. Ö., & Şavk, S. (2024). From scriptor to promptor: An evaluation of the status of authorship, authenticity, and creativity in light of the use of artificial intelligence in screenwriting. ARTS: Artuklu Sanat ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 12, 57-82. https://doi.org/10.46372/arts.1482636

Cited By

A study on the limits of digital creativity in the context of contemporary art and cinema

ARTS: Artuklu Sanat ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.46372/arts.1551051

Education and artificial intelligence in communication studies: A technical-practical-ethical discussion in students’ experience of use

ARTS: Artuklu Sanat ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.46372/arts.1585826

Soyut Makine Kavramı ile Dijital Algoritmaları Anlamak: Yapay Zekâ Dil Modeli Üzerine Bir Eleştirel Söylem Çalışması

İlef Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.24955/ilef.1638349