Research Article

Evaluation of music generated by artificial intelligence from a compositional perspective

Number: Yapay zekâ ve sanat özel sayısı October 22, 2025
TR EN

Evaluation of music generated by artificial intelligence from a compositional perspective

Abstract

This study explores how music generated by artificial intelligence (AI) can be evaluated from a compositional perspective. As AI becomes more involved in music production, it challenges traditional notions of creativity and authorship. “The problem statement of this study is defined as addressing the theoretical gap concerning the evaluation of AI-generated music in the context of composition.” The study compares AI-generated music and human composition in terms of aesthetic value, originality, and coherence. Findings from recent literature show that while AI can create technically competent and musically pleasing works, it lacks emotional depth, creative intuition, and artistic intent. Therefore, AI is seen not as a composer but as a supportive tool that enhances the creative process. This study contributes to ongoing theoretical debates about AI’s role in contemporary music composition.

Keywords

References

  1. Arielli, E. (2024a). Even an AI could do that. In E. Arielli & L. Manovich (Eds.), Artificial aesthetics: Generative AI, art and visual media (pp. 8–24). Retrieved from https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/artificial-aesthetics
  2. Arielli, E. (2024b). Human perception and the artificial gaze. In E. Arielli & L. Manovich (Eds.), Artificial aesthetics: Generative AI, art and visual media (pp. 95–117). Retrieved from https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/artificial-aesthetics
  3. Agapiou, A. (2024). A systematic review of the Socio-Legal dimensions of responsible AI and its role in improving health and safety in construction. Buildings, 14(5), 1469, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051469
  4. Angeler, D. G., & Benavent-Corai, J. (2017). Ecological approaches to quantifying (Bio) diversity in music. Quantifying diversity in music. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201704.0133.v1
  5. Anglada-Tort, M., & Müllensiefen, D. (2017). The repeated recording illusion. Music perception an interdisciplinary journal, 35(1), 94 117. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2017.35.1.94
  6. Argstatter, H. (2015). Perception of basic emotions in music: Culture-specific or multicultural? Psychology of music, 44(4), 674–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615589214
  7. Avdeeff, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence & popular music: SKYGGE, flow machines, and the audio uncanny valley. Arts, 8(4), 130, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8040130
  8. Balkwill, L., & Thompson, W. F. (1999). A Cross-Cultural investigation of the perception of emotion in music: psychophysical and cultural cues. Music perception an interdisciplinary journal, 17(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285811

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Media Technologies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 22, 2025

Submission Date

July 15, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 12, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Number: Yapay zekâ ve sanat özel sayısı

APA
Oyan Küpeli, S. (2025). Evaluation of music generated by artificial intelligence from a compositional perspective. ARTS: Artuklu Sanat Ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, Yapay zekâ ve sanat özel sayısı, 239-261. https://doi.org/10.46372/arts.1743089