Defining the Adaptive Reuse of Traditional Houses for Tourism Purposes Through Multi-Choice Process: Türkiye-Konya/Sille Example
Öz
“Architecture” is one of the tools that define sustainable cultural tourism. The sustainability of architecture which is an important source of culture is possible by conversation and restoration studies. It is observed that the most worn-out building group is residential buildings due to the lack of strict rules for historical settlements with this potential. A process based on the existence of traditional houses in historical settlements with their current function has been defined to be a tool, not a goal; particularly in cases where this becomes difficult. The Sille quarter which contains various cultural richness of Turkey and provides an adequate touristic axis for the province of Konya has been discussed. Fundamental decisions have been made to determine new functions that will define the model where functions other than residences will not cause transport capacity problems, social and cultural pressures; and prevent protected areas to become the decor of commercial activities.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Housing adaptive reuse cultural tourism multiple choice method interior
Destekleyen Kurum
TUBİTAK
Proje Numarası
114K599
Teşekkür
This study was supported by TUBITAK 3001 Beginning R&D Program (the Scientific and Technological Research and Council of Turkey, Grant Number: 114K599). We would like to express our gratitude to the TUBITAK project team. Ethics Committee approval in the study, Ethics Committee of the University of Karadeniz Technical University dated 21.04.2014 with the decision no.24237859-242 was taken.
Kaynakça
- Abdullah F., Basha, B. & Soomro, A. R. (2017). Sustainable heritage: analytical study on the viability of adaptive reuse with social approach, case study of asia heritage row, Kuala Lumpur. Advanced Science Letters, 23(7), 6179-6183.
- Adiwibowo, R. S., Widodo, P. & Santosa, I. J. P. S. (2015). Correlations between public appreciation of historical building and intention to visit heritage building reused as retail store. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 357-364.
- Ahunbay, Z. (2013). 2013’ün tartışmalı yeniden kullanım ve ihyaları. TMMOB Mimarlık Dergisi, 374, 49-53.
- Aigwi, I. E., Ingham, J., Phipps, R. & Filippova, O. (2020). Identifying parameters for a performance-based framework: Towards prioritising underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse in New Zealand. CITIES, 102.
- Ariffin, A. B., Zahari, M. S. M. & Hanafiah, M. H. (2020). Adaptive reuse of historic buildings: connecting the links between tourist appreciation and visitation, Property Management.
- Atash, F. (1993). Fragmentation of the urban fabric: the experience of middle Eastern and North African cities. CITIES, 10(4), 313-325.
- Ball, R. (1999). Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant buildings. Building Research and Information, 27(3), 140‐148.
- Bentley, I. & Butina-Watson, G. (2007). Identity by design. Elsevier.
- Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. D. (2009). Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: learning from the experiences of Los Angeles. Structural Survey, 27(5), 351‐60.
- Caterina, G., Pinto, R. M., Fabricatti, K., Oppido, S., Bianchi, A., Medici, S. & Torro, P. (2004). Reusing and Managing the Real Albergo De Poveri of Naples; Evaluation and Re-Design for Improved Efficiency, Facilities Management Maintenence Human Elements in Facilities Management Understanding Need of Our Customer Proceeding the CIBW70, 129-139, Hong Kong.
- Chadijah, S. & Fajarwati, A. A. (2020). Re-programming Sa’o, pursuing sustainable architecture in Ngada traditional house: a recommendation. E&ES, 426(1), 012082.
- ÇEKÜL Vakfı. (2012). Tarihi Kentler Birliği. Sürdürülebilir Kültür Turizmi İçin Kamu-Yerel-Sivil-Özel İş birliği, Çekül Vakfı-Tarihi Kentler Birliği Yayınları Kılavuz Kitapçıklar Dizisi 1, Ebat Ofset Publishing, Gaziantep. Access Address (17.10.2016): http://library.atilim.edu.tr/shares/ library/files/ekitap/S%C3%BCrd%C3%BCr%C3%BClebilirK %C3%BClt%C3%BCrTurizmi_2012-Ekitap.pdf
- DEH (2004). Annual Report 2004-05. South Australia: The Department for Environment and Heritage.
- Department of Environment and Heritage (DEH). (2004). Adaptive Reuse, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
- Dikmen, Ç. B. (2017). Reuse of Traditional Houses: Case Study Yozgat, 6th International Symposium on Conservation and Consolidation of Historical Structures, 2-3-4 November.
- Ertaş, Ş. (2016). Archive photo.
- Ertaş Ş. & Taş, A. (2017). Changing effect of place on frontage design in the context of cultural sustainability. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 14, 71-89.
- Ertaş Beşir, Ş. & Bekar, İ. (2020). Functional Performance After Reuse in Traditional Houses, Advances in Scientific Research: Engineering and Architecture, St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, ISBN: 978-954-07-5047-7.
Geleneksel Konutların Turizm Amaçlı Yeniden İşlevlendirilmesinin Çok Seçenekli Süreçle Tanımlanması: Türkiye-Konya/Sille Örneği
Öz
Sürdürebilir kültür turizmini ifade eden araçlardan biri de “mimari” dir. Önemli bir kültür kaynağı olan mimarinin sürdürülebilirliği, koruma ve restorasyon çalışmalarının yapılması ile mümkündür. Bu potansiyele sahip tarihi yerleşimler için katı kuralların bulunmaması nedeniyle en çok yıpranan yapı grubunun konut yapıları olduğu görülmektedir.Çalışma tarihi yerleşmelerde bulunan geleneksel konutların mevcut işlevi ile varlığını sürdürmesinin esas alınarak; özellikle restorasyon sonrası turizm gibi tetikleyici nedenlerle bunun zorlaştığı durumlarda gündeme gelen yeniden işlevlendirmenin bir amaç değil, araçolması gerekliliğine yönelik bir model ortaya konmuştur. Türkiye’de farklı kültürel zenginlikleri barındıran; Konya ili için alternatif bir turizm aksı oluşturarak yeterli bir turizm arzına sahip Sille mahallesi ele alınmıştır. Konut dışı fonksiyonların ulaşım kapasitesi sorunlarına, sosyal ve kültürel baskılara yol açmayacağı ve korunan alanların ticari faaliyetlerin dekoru haline gelmesine engel olmayacağı modeli tanımlayacak yeni fonksiyonların belirlenmesi için temel kararlar alındı.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Konut yeniden işlevlendirme kültür turizmi çoktan seçmeli yöntem iç mekan
Proje Numarası
114K599
Kaynakça
- Abdullah F., Basha, B. & Soomro, A. R. (2017). Sustainable heritage: analytical study on the viability of adaptive reuse with social approach, case study of asia heritage row, Kuala Lumpur. Advanced Science Letters, 23(7), 6179-6183.
- Adiwibowo, R. S., Widodo, P. & Santosa, I. J. P. S. (2015). Correlations between public appreciation of historical building and intention to visit heritage building reused as retail store. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 357-364.
- Ahunbay, Z. (2013). 2013’ün tartışmalı yeniden kullanım ve ihyaları. TMMOB Mimarlık Dergisi, 374, 49-53.
- Aigwi, I. E., Ingham, J., Phipps, R. & Filippova, O. (2020). Identifying parameters for a performance-based framework: Towards prioritising underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse in New Zealand. CITIES, 102.
- Ariffin, A. B., Zahari, M. S. M. & Hanafiah, M. H. (2020). Adaptive reuse of historic buildings: connecting the links between tourist appreciation and visitation, Property Management.
- Atash, F. (1993). Fragmentation of the urban fabric: the experience of middle Eastern and North African cities. CITIES, 10(4), 313-325.
- Ball, R. (1999). Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant buildings. Building Research and Information, 27(3), 140‐148.
- Bentley, I. & Butina-Watson, G. (2007). Identity by design. Elsevier.
- Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. D. (2009). Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: learning from the experiences of Los Angeles. Structural Survey, 27(5), 351‐60.
- Caterina, G., Pinto, R. M., Fabricatti, K., Oppido, S., Bianchi, A., Medici, S. & Torro, P. (2004). Reusing and Managing the Real Albergo De Poveri of Naples; Evaluation and Re-Design for Improved Efficiency, Facilities Management Maintenence Human Elements in Facilities Management Understanding Need of Our Customer Proceeding the CIBW70, 129-139, Hong Kong.
- Chadijah, S. & Fajarwati, A. A. (2020). Re-programming Sa’o, pursuing sustainable architecture in Ngada traditional house: a recommendation. E&ES, 426(1), 012082.
- ÇEKÜL Vakfı. (2012). Tarihi Kentler Birliği. Sürdürülebilir Kültür Turizmi İçin Kamu-Yerel-Sivil-Özel İş birliği, Çekül Vakfı-Tarihi Kentler Birliği Yayınları Kılavuz Kitapçıklar Dizisi 1, Ebat Ofset Publishing, Gaziantep. Access Address (17.10.2016): http://library.atilim.edu.tr/shares/ library/files/ekitap/S%C3%BCrd%C3%BCr%C3%BClebilirK %C3%BClt%C3%BCrTurizmi_2012-Ekitap.pdf
- DEH (2004). Annual Report 2004-05. South Australia: The Department for Environment and Heritage.
- Department of Environment and Heritage (DEH). (2004). Adaptive Reuse, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
- Dikmen, Ç. B. (2017). Reuse of Traditional Houses: Case Study Yozgat, 6th International Symposium on Conservation and Consolidation of Historical Structures, 2-3-4 November.
- Ertaş, Ş. (2016). Archive photo.
- Ertaş Ş. & Taş, A. (2017). Changing effect of place on frontage design in the context of cultural sustainability. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 14, 71-89.
- Ertaş Beşir, Ş. & Bekar, İ. (2020). Functional Performance After Reuse in Traditional Houses, Advances in Scientific Research: Engineering and Architecture, St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, ISBN: 978-954-07-5047-7.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | İç Mimarlık |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Proje Numarası | 114K599 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Temmuz 2023 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 24 Mart 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 - JASA_2023, 8(1) |
